Page 1 of 1

1ES 1011+496, EBL: Ready for full MAGIC collab.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 2:50 pm
by admin
Posted on behalf of Adiv Gonzalez (based on e-mail sent by Adiv on July 16th)

Dear collaborators,
Please find attached the draft on the EBL measurements from the MAGIC observations of 1ES1011+496 in February-March 2014.

EBL_1ES1011_2015_07_15.pdf
1ES 1011+496, EBL: Manuscript version ready for review in the full MAGIC collab.
(273.41 KiB) Downloaded 140 times



In the present version a table comparing the fit probabilities for the null EBL and the best fit EBL value is yet to be included and the author list probably is not the latest (Adiv has connection problems to the MAGIC website from his location). The MAGIC author list will be updated as soon as he is back to his institute and a new version will be posted. But in the mean time the MAGIC collaborators can review the contents of this "almost final" version.

Comments are expected to arrive before Friday July 31th (two weeks from the moment this manuscript was sent to magic priv).

Re: 1ES 1011+496, EBL: Ready for full MAGIC collab.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2015 8:54 pm
by adiv.gonzalezmunoz
Hi

The period has finished and only the IFAE group send comments to the paper. Please find in the attachment is the pdf file with the embedded comments.

The comments will be implemented and a new version will be posted soon.


Adiv

Re: 1ES 1011+496, EBL: Ready for full MAGIC collab.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:17 am
by adiv.gonzalezmunoz
Hi All

With some delay, but please find in the attachment the latest version of the paper, where I included all the comments and modifications send by the IFAE group, also including the missing table requested by Ulisses.


Thanks

Adiv

Re: 1ES 1011+496, EBL: Ready for full MAGIC collab.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 13, 2015 11:21 am
by david.paneque
Dear all,
I quickly went over the new version and I could see that Adiv made a good job addressing all the remarks provided by IFAE group (which were really good, and helped improving the manuscript further !!).

I have few additional minor remarks, that relate mostly to the author list and the references. See below.
Apart from that, I would say the paper is ready to go to the last review before submission.


Few comments about the author list:

-1-
Due to a technical problem, two members from MPI (Hahn and Moretti), who should have been included in the author list since the beginning of July, were not included until August. Since this paper circulated thgough MAGIC priv on late July, these two people should be included.

A.~Hahn\inst{7} \and
E.~Moretti\inst{7} \and

-2-
Additionally, Masahiro pointed out a problem (now corrected): he should have two affiliations, the one in MPI (main affiliation) and the one in Japan. This is now fixed in the new author list. For this paper you can simply add the number 20:


M.~Teshima\inst{7,20}\and



Few comments about the references:
-1-
The reference Aleksic 2014 (performance paper) needs to be updated
The coordinates are not yet final, but they will be soon. For the time being you can use
Aleksi ́c, J., et al. 2015, APh, in press
((http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... 0515000316))

Additionally, I would also mention (together with the perforamnce paper, at the end of the introduction) the other upgrade paper, the one that reports about the hardware changes.
Aleksi ́c, J., et al. 2015, APh, in press
(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... 0515000663)


-2-
you have two "Ansoldi et al 2015 papers".
I believe you refer to the other 1es1011 MAGIC papers, right ?
These papers have already been submitted.
Two things about them:
a) You only refer to one of them in the text. You should cite them both
b) They are actually NOT Ansoldi et al, but rather:

M. L. Ahnen, S. Ansoldi, L. A. Antonelli et al., submitted to MNRAS
for the paper with the 2008 data
J. Aleksic, S. Ansoldi, L. A. Antonelli et al., submitted to A&A
for the paper with 2011/2012 data
This one was circulated long ago in magic priv, and that is why it has the Aleskic as the first author.





In conclusions:

" period, no significan change "
-->
" period, no significant change "

Re: 1ES 1011+496, EBL: Ready for full MAGIC collab.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 13, 2015 10:44 pm
by adiv.gonzalezmunoz
OK, all the remarks has been included

Please find in the attachment the lasted version of the paper

Re: 1ES 1011+496, EBL: Ready for full MAGIC collab.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 18, 2015 1:28 pm
by stefano.covino
Hi Adiv, et al.

I think you have properly addressed our previous comments, so for me the paper is ready for further steps.


Cheers,
Stefano