MAGIC Forum Review System

Hi

Thank you for reviewing the paper. I made a very last check and I found out that a couple of numbers in the main text did not coincide with the numbers in the abstract (the numbers in the abstract are the good ones). Those numbers were already checked by Abelardo and Priya for the ICRC proceeding. Now proceeding and this paper have the same results. You can find in the attachment the very last version with that discrepancy already fixed.

I'll proceed with the submission process.


Adiv

Dear authors, David,

I have read the new version of the paper and you can go ahead.
It reads very well and I am fine with modifications implemented from past version.

Best Wishes,
Ulisses.

Posted on behalf of Stefano Covino

Hi Adiv, et al.

I think you have properly addressed our previous comments, so for me the paper is ready for further steps.


Cheers,
Stefano

Hi

Please find attached the latest draft on the EBL measurements from the MAGIC observations of 1ES1011+496 in February-March 2014, which includes all remarks by the internal referees and members of the collaboration.



This is the version that is intended to be submitted to Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Cheers

Adiv